The logic of scientific discovery in critical realist social scientific research

Journal of Critical Realism 4 (2):366-394 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critical realism claims to bring a significant improvement to social science, especially in comparison with empiricist and interpretive approaches. So far, however, it has fallen short of the high expectations it raises. Critical realist arguments are convincing on the philosophical or meta-theoretical level but the contributions of critical realism to social science in terms of research activities at the field level are less clear. Nonetheless, there is no way back. Moving forward requires that the practice of doing social scientific research be no longer perceived as limited to the justification of specific knowledge claims but must be seen as an integral part of the cycle of scientific discovery.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A.I., Scientific discovery and realism.Mario Alai - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (1):21-42.
Conventionalism, scientific discovery and the sociology of knowledge.Angelo M. Petroni - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):225-240.
Does scientific discovery have a logic?Herbert A. Simon - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (4):471-480.
Machine discovery.Herbert Simon - 1995 - Foundations of Science 1 (2):171-200.
Methodological realism and scientific rationality.Jarrett Leplin - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):31-51.
Horizon for Scientific Practice: Scientific Discovery and Progress.James A. Marcum - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):187-215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
103 (#165,954)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?