A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation

Studia Logica 93 (2-3):383-403 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we prove the correspondence between complete extensions in abstract argumentation and 3-valued stable models in logic programming. This result is in line with earlier work of [6] that identified the correspondence between the grounded extension in abstract argumentation and the well-founded model in logic programming, as well as between the stable extensions in abstract argumentation and the stable models in logic programming

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A splitting logic in NExt(KTB).Yutaka Miyazaki - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (3):381 - 394.
Fibring Argumentation Frames.Dov M. Gabbay - 2009 - Studia Logica 93 (2):231-295.
Axiomatic Extensions of IMT3 Logic.Joan Gispert & Antoni Torrens - 2005 - Studia Logica 81 (3):311-324.
Multi-valued Semantics: Why and How.Arnon Avron - 2009 - Studia Logica 92 (2):163-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-21

Downloads
56 (#273,290)

6 months
11 (#191,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dov Gabbay
Hebrew University of Jerusalem