Scientific humanities and philosophical conceptions of symbol. Meta-semiotic considerations

Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 25:210-226 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The issue discussed in this paper, although controversial, is cognitively nontrivial. Namely, we shall be interested in the matter of possibility to use certain semiotic conceptions in research conducted in the area of a certain group of specific sciences, that is humanities. The aim of this work is to show the possibility of adopting in humanities ready-made conceptions of symbol created on the grounds of the analytical philosophy of language and logical semiotics. Also, we wish to outline the actual state of assimilating and using the mentioned philosophical conceptions by scientists who represent the sciences under consideration.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Economics, Law, Humanities: Homo-what? An Introduction.Paolo Silvestri - 2019 - Teoria E Critica Della Regolazione Sociale 19 (2):7-14.
Meta-conceivability.Philip Corkum - 2012 - Essays in Philosophy 13 (1):12.
Presence, Representation, and Significance.Hans-Georg Moeller - 2007 - American Journal of Semiotics 23 (1-4):243-252.
Rethinking Medical Humanities.Luca Chiapperino & Giovanni Boniolo - 2014 - Journal of Medical Humanities 35 (4):377-387.
Business and/as/of the Humanities.Christopher Michaelson - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:201-212.
Business and/as/of the Humanities.Christopher Michaelson - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:201-212.
On a Cognitive Model of Semiosis.Piotr Konderak - 2015 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 40 (1):129-144.
On the distinction between the concept of God and conceptions of God.Eberhard Herrmann - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (2):63 - 73.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-10

Downloads
4 (#1,590,841)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Mary Jo Nye.
The Savage Mind.Alasdair MacIntyre & Claude Levi-Strauss - 1967 - Philosophical Quarterly 17 (69):372.

View all 26 references / Add more references