More qualia trouble for functionalism: The Smythies TV-Hood analogy

Synthese 97 (3):365-82 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is the purpose of this article to explicate the logical implications of a television analogy for perception, first suggested by John R. Smythies (1956). It aims to show not only that one cannot escape the postulation of qualia that have an evolutionary purpose not accounted for within a strong functionalist theory, but also that it undermines other anti-representationalist arguments as well as some representationalist ones.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heirs of nothing: The implications of transparency.Matthew Kennedy - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):574-604.
What synaesthesia really tells us about functionalism.Richard Gray - 2004 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (9):64-69.
Inspecting images: A reply to Smythies.Edmond L. Wright - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (252):225-228.
Functionalism and sensations.Mark Brown - 1983 - Auslegung 10:218-28.
Two more proofs of present qualia.Edmond Wright - 1990 - Theoria 56 (1-2):3-22.
Testing robots for qualia.James H. Moor - 1988 - In Herbert R. Otto & James A. Tuedio (eds.), Perspectives on Mind. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Functionalism and qualia.Sydney Shoemaker - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 27 (May):291-315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#172,315)

6 months
12 (#178,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.

View all 57 references / Add more references