May I Treat A Collective As A Mere Means

American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):273-284 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Kant, it is impermissible to treat humanity as a mere means. If we accept Kant's equation of humanity with rational agency, and are literalists about ascriptions of agency to collectives it appears to follow that we may not treat collectives as mere means. On most standard accounts of what it is to treat something as a means this conclusion seems highly implausible. I conclude that we are faced with a range of options. One would be to rethink the equation of humanity with rationality. Another would be to abandon the prohibition on treating as a means. The last would be to abandon literalist construals of attribution of agency to collectives

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Treating Others Merely as Means.Samuel Kerstein - 2009 - Utilitas 21 (2):163-180.
Designer Babies and Treating People as a Means.Tuija Takala - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:245-249.
The Feasibility of Collectives' Actions.Holly Lawford-Smith - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):453-467.
Did Kant Respect Persons?Michael Neumann - 2000 - Res Publica 6 (3):285-299.
Kantianism and Mere Means.Christopher A. Brown - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (3):267-284.
Defending Double Effect.Alison Hills - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):133-152.
On the Universal Law and Humanity Formulas.Sven Nyholm - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Michigan

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-31

Downloads
709 (#11,769)

6 months
22 (#46,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bill Wringe
Bilkent University

Citations of this work

Corporate Crocodile Tears? On the Reactive Attitudes of Corporate Agents.Gunnar Björnsson & Kendy Hess - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):273–298.
Can a Corporation Be Worthy of Moral Consideration?Kenneth Silver - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 159 (1):253-265.
Group Agents and Moral Status: What Can We Owe to Organizations?Adam Lovett & Stefan Riedener - 2021 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51 (3):221–238.
Collective Obligations and Demandingness Complaints.Brian Berkey - 2019 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 6 (1):113-132.
Does the Machine Need a Ghost? Corporate Agents as Nonconscious Kantian Moral Agents.Kendy M. Hess - 2018 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4 (1):67-86.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Kantian Ethics.Allen W. Wood - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 30 references / Add more references