Cogency and Question‐Begging: Some Reflections on McKinsey's Paradox and Putnam's Proof

Philosophical Issues 10 (1):140-163 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Question-begging and infinite regress.Henry W. Johnstone - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):291-293.
Begging the question.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):174 – 191.
Petitio principii: What's wrong?Andrea Iacona & Diego Marconi - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (1):19-34.
Reflections on Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
McKinsey one more time.Crispin Wright - 2008 - In Anthony Hatzimoysis (ed.), Self-Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Transmission of Justification and Warrant.Luca Moretti & Tommaso Piazza - 2013 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Contexts of Begging the Question.Jim Mackenzie - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):227-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
39 (#399,999)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Highlights of recent epistemology.James Pryor - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):95--124.
When Transmission Fails.Chris Tucker - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (4):497-529.
Transmission Failure Failure.Nicholas Silins - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):71-102.
Moorean Facts and Belief Revision, or Can the Skeptic Win?Thomas Kelly - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):179-209.

View all 50 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references