Knockdown Arguments

Informal Logic 17 (3):316-336 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my position, defend my views, and critique their arguments. Last, I argue ad baculum against both of them, threatening both with the loss of reputation, employment, and respect unless they repudiate every objection raised against me and publicly abase themselves

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why Thought Experiments are Not Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Three Arguments against Intentionalism in Interpretation.Michael Wreen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:283-287.
Self-referential arguments in philosophy.Elke Brendel - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
Transcendental arguments and the problem of dogmatism.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
Logic and Theism.Graham Oppy - 2006 - Philo 9 (1):73-91.
Transcendental arguments: A plea for modesty.Robert Stern - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):143-161.
Essentialist arguments against descriptivism.Michael Mcglone - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):443-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-04

Downloads
120 (#146,688)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael J. Wreen
Marquette University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references