Informal Logic 17 (3):316-336 (1995)

Authors
Michael J. Wreen
Marquette University
Abstract
Two brainless curs, Alan Brinton and Douglas Walton, have recently had the impudence to suggest that several of my views on argumentum ad baculum are mistaken. While hardship and toil await them in this life and eternal damnation in the next, punishment begins with this paper. In it, I clarify my position, defend my views, and critique their arguments. Last, I argue ad baculum against both of them, threatening both with the loss of reputation, employment, and respect unless they repudiate every objection raised against me and publicly abase themselves
Keywords argumentum ad baculum, ad baculum fallacy, fear, threat, dialectical approach to argumentation, rhetorical approach to argumentation, individuation of arguments, coercive arguments
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knockdown Arguments.Nathan Ballantyne - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (S3):525-543.
Argumentum Ad Baculum.John Woods - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (4):493-504.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Why Thought Experiments Are Not Arguments.Michael A. Bishop - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541.
Three Arguments Against Intentionalism in Interpretation.Michael Wreen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:283-287.
Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy.Elke Brendel - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
Transcendental Arguments and the Problem of Dogmatism.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
Logic and Theism.Graham Oppy - 2006 - Philo 9 (1):73-91.
Transcendental Arguments: A Plea for Modesty.Robert Stern - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):143-161.
Essentialist arguments against descriptivism.Michael McGlone - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (4):443-462.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-04

Total views
111 ( #106,779 of 2,518,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,186 of 2,518,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes