David L. Hull, Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science [Book Review]

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (2):191-192 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a book review of David Hull's edited volume of collected papers, Science and Selection.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A review of David Hull, science and selection: Essays on biological evolution and the philosophy of science. [REVIEW]Stephen M. Downes - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (5):739-742.
David Hull, Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science.D. Castle - 2002 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23 (2):291-291.
Evolutionary epistemology, social epistemology, and the demic structure of science.Todd A. Grantham - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):443-463.
Selection and science: Critical notice of David Hull's science as a process. [REVIEW]Alex Rosenberg - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):217-228.
David Hull’s Natural Philosophy of Science.Paul E. Griffiths - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):301-310.
Science and selection.Kim Sterelny - 1994 - Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):45-62.
Conceptual Evolution: A Response.David L. Hull - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:255 - 264.
An evolutionary account of science: A response to Rosenberg's critical notice. [REVIEW]David L. Hull - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):229-236.
The adaptive landscape of science.John S. Wilkins - 2008 - Biology and Philosophy 23 (5):659-671.
Invisible hands and the success of science.K. Brad Wray - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):163-175.
Does science have a “global goal?”: A critique of Hull's view of conceptual progress. [REVIEW]Todd Grantham - 1994 - Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):85-97.
At last: Serious consideration.David L. Hull, Rodney E. Langman & Sigrid S. Glenn - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):559-569.
``Why study history for science?''.Jane Maienschein - 2000 - Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):339-348.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-24

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

K. Brad Wray
Aarhus University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references