Special issue—before translational medicine: laboratory clinic relations lost in translation? Cortisone and the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Britain, 1950–1960

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41 (4):54 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cortisone, initially known as ‘compound E’ was the medical sensation of the late 1940s and early 1950s. As early as April 1949, only a week after Philip Hench and colleagues first described the potential of ‘compound E’ at a Mayo Clinic seminar, the New York Times reported the drug’s promise as a ‘modern miracle’ in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Given its high profile, it is unsurprising that historians of medicine have been attracted to study the innovation of cortisone. It arrived at the end of a decade of ‘therapeutic revolutions’, kicked off by penicillin transforming the treatment of bacterial infections and ending with hopes of a revolution in the treatment of non-infectious, chronic inflammatory diseases. Despite these studies of cortisone’s introduction, few historians have taken the story forward and considered how cortisone was adopted and adapted into clinical practice. This article tells the longer of how the drug and its derivatives were taken from research laboratories and integrated into clinical practice; what has in recent decades become known as translational medicine. In exploring cortisone’s first decade in Britain, we focus specifically on its role in the treatment of RA. Our approach is always to consider cortisone’s use in the context of other treatments available to clinicians, and at local and national institutional settings. We do not discuss the many other therapeutic uses of cortisone, which ranged for topical applications for skin diseases to the management of cancers, especially childhood leukaemia, nor do we discuss its close analogue ACTH—AdenoCorticoTropic Hormone. We think there are lessons in our study for TM policies today.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Making British Cortisone: Glaxo and the development of Corticosteroids in Britain in the 1950s–1960s.Viviane Quirke - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4):645-674.
Phenylbutazone : one drug across two species.Michael Worboys & Elizabeth Toon - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):27.
Translating Trial Results in Clinical Practice: the Risk GP Model.Jonathan Fuller & Luis J. Flores - 2016 - Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 9:167-168.
Ethical Issues in Translational Research.Carlo Petrini - 2010 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):517-533.
Translational ethics? The theory-practice gap in medical ethics.A. Cribb - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (4):207-210.
Rheumatoid Arthritis—Heresies and Speculations.David A. Fox - 1997 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 40 (4):190-190.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-08

Downloads
6 (#1,389,828)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Phenylbutazone : one drug across two species.Michael Worboys & Elizabeth Toon - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):27.
Making British Cortisone: Glaxo and the development of Corticosteroids in Britain in the 1950s–1960s.Viviane Quirke - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4):645-674.
Cortisone therapy: a challenge to academic medicine in 1949-1952.G. Hetenyi & J. Karsh - 1996 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 40 (3):426-439.
Making British Cortisone: Glaxo and the development of Corticosteroids in Britain in the 1950s–1960s.Viviane Quirke - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4):645-674.

Add more references