The Doctrine of Double Effect: Philosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle

University of Notre Dame Press (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophers and ethicists debate this controversial moral principle illustrating its application to current moral dilemmas such as war, suicide, nuclear power, affirmative action, and morphine use for terminal cancer patients.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,391

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Psychological Origins of the Doctrine of Double Effect.Fiery Cushman - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4):763-776.
Who is entitled to double effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
Ethics Without Intention.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Bloomsbury Academic.
Some Light on Double Effect.James G. Hanink - 1975 - Analysis 35 (5):147 - 151.
Intentions, motives and the doctrine of double effect.Lawrence Masek - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):567-585.
Double effect, double intention, and asymmetric warfare.Steven Lee - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (3):233-251.
Four versions of double effect.Donald B. Marquis - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):515-544.
The Theoretical Tenability of the Doctrine of Double Effect.T. J. Bole - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):467-473.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-20

Downloads
21 (#543,512)

6 months
13 (#73,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references