Abstract

A truly enlightened anthropocentrism that understood the human in its essential interdependency with other creatures but nonetheless concluded that the human species was toxic to the planet could identify with the life-stream and, on the basis of values it cherished, in the absence of necessary radical transformation, will its own demise. The distinctive value of the human cannot rest on virtues of which we are in principle capable but which we repeatedly fail to realize. Is there a logical or metaphysical link, as Schelling and Derrida in different ways suggest, between our seemingly suicidal and toxic behavior as a species and what we might broadly call our capacity for “transcendence”? Or should we lay the blame more concretely on the form that global capitalism has taken? Even if we do in fact have the resources to overcome our species narcissism, an even more disturbing question awaits us. Human evolution could generate a predictable human being with whom we would have little reason to identify. What then?