Should we talk about the ‘benefits’ of breastfeeding? The significance of the default in representations of infant feeding

Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (11):756-760 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Breastfeeding advocates have criticised the phrase ‘breast is best’ as mistakenly representing breastfeeding as a departure from the norm rather than the default for infant feeding. Breastfeeding mothers have an interest in representing breastfeeding as the default, for example, to counteract criticism of breastfeeding outside the home. This connects to an increasing trend to frame feeding babies formula as harmful, which can be seen in research papers, public policy and information presented to parents and prospective parents. Whether we frame infant-feeding decisions in terms of harming or benefit, protection or risk matters because these distinctions are generally morally significant and thus holding that those who decide to use formula ‘harm’, ‘risk harm’ to their babies or describing formula feeding as ‘dangerous’ is likely to contribute to guilt associated with formula feeding and thus to undermine the well-being of vulnerable women. It may undermine attempts to improve breastfeeding rates by leading women to reject information about health outcomes surrounding infant-feeding decisions. However, these distinctions do not apply easily to infant-feeding decisions, in part because of difficulties in determining whether we should treat breastfeeding as the normative baseline for infant feeding. I show that neither the descriptive ‘facts of the matter’ nor moral or pragmatic considerations provide an easy answer before discussing how to respond to these considerations.

Similar books and articles

Parent-infant bed-sharing behavior.Helen Ball - 2006 - Human Nature 17 (3):301-318.
Breast-Feeding in London, 1905–19.Valerie Fildes - 1992 - Journal of Biosocial Science 24 (1):53-70.
Who Supports Breastfeeding Mothers?Jayme Cisco - 2017 - Human Nature 28 (2):231-253.
Breastfeeding Mothers’ Experiences: The Ghost in the Machine.Paul Regan & Elaine Ball - 2013 - Qualitative Health Research 23 (5):679-688.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-26

Downloads
221 (#83,596)

6 months
64 (#60,259)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fiona Woollard
University of Southampton

References found in this work

The Limits of Morality.Michael Slote - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (4):915-917.
The Theory of Morality.Alan Donagan - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 41 (2):348-348.
The Theory of Morality.Adina Schwartz - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (4):649.
Rights and the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing.Kai Draper - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (3):253-280.

View all 6 references / Add more references