Mind 122 (485):171-216 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper argues for the presence in Plato’s work of a conception of thinking central to which is what I call the Transparency View. According to this view, in order for a subject to think of a given object, the subject must represent that object just as it is, without inaccuracy or distortion. I examine the ways in which this conception influences Plato’s epistemology and metaphysics and explore some ramifications for contemporary views about mental content
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/mind/fzt012 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
View all 80 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Why Are There Two Versions of Meno’s Paradox?Douglas A. Shepardson - forthcoming - Southern Journal of Philosophy.
Similar books and articles
Plato.R. M. Hare - 1982 - In R. M. Hare, Jonathan Barnes & Henry Chadwick (eds.), Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 724-726.
Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form.Charles H. Kahn - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-03-26
Total views
166 ( #69,580 of 2,498,767 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,767 )
2013-03-26
Total views
166 ( #69,580 of 2,498,767 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #280,195 of 2,498,767 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads