Methodology and Apologetics: Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society

British Journal for the History of Science 13 (1):1-26 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Central to Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society was the description and justification of the method adopted and advocated by the Fellows of the Society, for it was thought that it was their method which distinguished them from ancients, dogmatists, sceptics, and contemporary natural philosophers such as Descartes. The Fellows saw themselves as furthering primarily a novel method, rather than a system, of philosophy, and the History gave expression to this corporate self-perception. However, the History's description of their method was not necessarily accurate. Rather, as will be argued below, by a combination of subtle misrepresentation and selective exposition, Sprat portrayed a method which would further the aims of social and ecclesiastical stability and material prosperity, essential for the Royal Society since its continued existence depended upon the creation of a social basis for the institutionalized pursuit of natural philosophy. Some link had to be forged between the activities of the Society and the intellectual and social aspirations of the Restoration. To understand the intent and meaning of Sprat's History and the method there portrayed, we must therefore look to the institutional needs which it fulfilled

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Royal Society, natural history and the peoples of the ‘New World’, 1660–1800.John Gascoigne - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Science 42 (4):539-562.
Correspondence networks and the Royal Society, 1700–1750.Andrea Rusnock - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Science 32 (2):155-169.
Origins of the Royal Institution.Thomas Martin - 1962 - British Journal for the History of Science 1 (1):49-63.
Thomas Hobbes.Stewart Duncan - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
18 (#711,533)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?