Ideals of rationality in dialogic

Argumentation 2 (4):395-408 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Needed for such dialogue games as dialectic are appropriate standards of fairness and rationality. The rules of procedure of dialectic must describe a game playable by actual human participants. The present paper centers on certain idealizations of the dialectician that are not allowable

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00128982

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rationality ideals and mentality.John Woods - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):419-424.
Woods on Ideals of Rationality in Dialogue.Jim Mackenzie - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):409-417.
The Concept of Ideals in Legal Theory.Sanne Taekema - 2003 - Kluwer Law International.
Does murphy’s law apply in epistemology?David Christensen - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 2:3-31.
Dialogic leadership as ethics action (praxis) method.Richard P. Nielsen - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (10):765 - 783.
Happiness, Rationality, and Individual Ideals.Lynne McFall - 1984 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (3):595 - 613.
Computational Dialogic Defeasible Reasoning.Robert L. Causey - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):421-450.
Coherence as an ideal of rationality.Lyle Zynda - 1996 - Synthese 109 (2):175 - 216.
The limits of instrumental rationality in social explanation.Doug Mann - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):165-189.
Motivation by ideal : A reaction to J. David Velleman.Wibren van der Burg & Sanne Taekema - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):91 – 98.
Rationality redeemed?: further dialogues on an educational ideal.Harvey Siegel - 1997 - London: Routedge.
The role of the unrealisable: a study in regulative ideals.Dorothy Emmet - 1994 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
More than a context for learning? The epistemic triangle and the dialogic mind.Charles Fernyhough - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):104-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
27 (#572,408)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Preface.Shahid Rahman & Helge Rückert - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):1-6.
Manipulations in argumentation.Zinaida Z. Ilatov - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (3):359-367.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Knowledge and belief.Jaakko Hintikka - 1962 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.

View all 34 references / Add more references