Buttercups, GNP's and Quarks: Are Fallacies Theoretical Entities?

Informal Logic 10 (2) (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Buttercups, GNP's and Quarks: Are Fallacies Theoretical Entities?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fallacies.Robert J. Fogelin & Timothy J. Duggan - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):255-262.
Mental entities as theoretical entities.Alan N. Sussman - 1975 - American Philosophical Quarterly 12 (4):277-288.
Mental terms, theoretical terms, and materialism.James W. Cornman - 1968 - Philosophy of Science 35 (March):45-63.
On Fictional Entities.Susan L. Feagin - 1983 - Philosophy and Literature 7 (2):240-243.
The Coherence of Hamblin’s Fallacies.Ralph Johnson - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):305-317.
Can quarks always be confined by a linear potential?H. B. Ai & J. P. Hsu - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (2):155-159.
Three fallacies.Jonathan E. Adler - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):665-666.
The hidden battles over emergence.Carl Gillett - 2006 - In Philip Clayton (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 801--819.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
36 (#434,037)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?