- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A smoothness constraint on the development of object recognition
Cognition 153 (C):140-145 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Types of Constraints on Development: An Interactivist Approach.Robert L. Campbell, Mark H. Bickhard, PO Box & Chandler-Ullmann Hall - unknown
Object recognition and Random Image Structure Evolution.Javid Sadr & Pawan Sinha - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (2):259-287.
Lambert, mally, and the principle of independence.Edward N. Zalta - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25 (1):447-459.
Roughness, smoothness, and preference: A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects.Gosta Ekman, Jan Hosman & Brita Lindstrom - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (1):18.
Object perception, perceptual recognition, and that-perception introduction.Vincent Hope - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (4):515-528.
From Self-Identity to Social Justice: The Sociology of Recognition.Anthony Lee Lack - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Olfactory Objects.Clare Batty - 2014 - In S. Biggs, D. Stokes & M. Matthen (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford University Press. pp. 222-245.
Importance of object recognition in size constancy.Robert C. Bolles & Daniel E. Bailey - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (3):222.
Independence of verbal and visual codes of the same stimuli.Harry P. Bahrick & Phyllis Bahrick - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):344.
Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.Irina M. Harris & Paul E. Dux - 2005 - Cognition 95 (1):73-93.
Change in motor plan with a change in the selection of the to-be-recognized word.Cécile Beauvillain - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):674-675.
How do animals solve object-recognition tasks?Dave G. Mumby - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):461-462.
Smooth Yet Discrete: Modeling Both Non-transitivity and the Smoothness of Graded Categories With Discrete Classification Rules. [REVIEW]Bert Baumgaertner - 2014 - Minds and Machines 24 (3):353-370.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-05-22
Downloads
9 (#1,187,161)
6 months
2 (#1,157,335)
2016-05-22
Downloads
9 (#1,187,161)
6 months
2 (#1,157,335)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A Developmental Approach to Machine Learning?Linda B. Smith & Lauren K. Slone - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
The Development of Invariant Object Recognition Requires Visual Experience With Temporally Smooth Objects.Justin N. Wood & Samantha M. W. Wood - 2018 - Cognitive Science 42 (4):1391-1406.
One-shot learning of view-invariant object representations in newborn chicks.Justin N. Wood & Samantha M. W. Wood - 2020 - Cognition 199 (C):104192.
Distorting Face Representations in Newborn Brains.Samantha M. W. Wood & Justin N. Wood - 2021 - Cognitive Science 45 (8):e13021.
References found in this work
Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism.Natasha Z. Kirkham, Jonathan A. Slemmer & Scott P. Johnson - 2002 - Cognition 83 (2):B35-B42.
Visual statistical learning in the newborn infant.Hermann Bulf, Scott P. Johnson & Eloisa Valenza - 2011 - Cognition 121 (1):127-132.
Individuation of visual objects over time.J. Feldman & P. Tremoulet - 2006 - Cognition 99 (2):131-165.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo