A Functional Account of Causation; or, A Defense of the Legitimacy of Causal Thinking by Reference to the Only Standard That Matters—Usefulness

Philosophy of Science 81 (5):691-713 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay advocates a “functional” approach to causation and causal reasoning: these are to be understood in terms of the goals and purposes of causal thinking. This approach is distinguished from accounts based on metaphysical considerations or on reconstruction of “intuitions.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-27

Downloads
273 (#71,211)

6 months
39 (#93,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Woodward
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Mental Causation for Standard Dualists.Bram Vaassen - 2024 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Explanation in Computational Neuroscience: Causal and Non-causal.M. Chirimuuta - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (3):849-880.
Halfway Proportionality.Bram Vaassen - 2022 - Philosophical Studies (9):1-21.

View all 30 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Sydney Shoemaker.
Causation.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (17):556-567.
Philosophical Papers Vol. II.David K. Lewis (ed.) - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference.Judea Pearl - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):201-202.

View all 21 references / Add more references