How fallacious is the consequence fallacy?

Philosophical Studies 165 (1):221-227 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Timothy Williamson argues against the tactic of criticizing confidence in a theory by identifying a logical consequence of the theory whose probability is not raised by the evidence. He dubs it “the consequence fallacy”. In this paper, we will show that Williamson’s formulation of the tactic in question is ambiguous. On one reading of Williamson’s formulation, the tactic is indeed a fallacy, but it is not a commonly used tactic; on another reading, it is a commonly used tactic (or at least more often used than the former tactic), but it is not a fallacy

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On a fallacy attributed to Tarski.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):227-234.
Plato and the "socratic fallacy".W. J. - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (2):97-113.
Plato and the "Socratic Fallacy".William Prior - 1998 - Phronesis 43 (2):97 - 113.
Etchemendy, Tarski, and Logical Consequence.Jared Bates - 1999 - Southwest Philosophy Review 15 (1):47-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-04

Downloads
100 (#175,178)

6 months
7 (#441,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Zanja Yudell
California State University, Chico
Wai-hung Wong
California State University, Chico

Citations of this work

Scepticism, defeasible evidence and entitlement.Daniele Sgaravatti - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (2):439-455.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
The structure of empirical knowledge.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer (ed.) - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

View all 12 references / Add more references