Angeletics and Epistemology, Angeletics as Epistemology: A Comparison Between Capurro’s Angeletics and Goldman’s Social Epistemology

In Messages and Messengers – Angeletics as an Approach to the Phenomenology of Communication / Von Boten und Botschaften – Die Angeletik als Weg zur Phänomenologie der Kommunikation (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nearly a decade ago, Rafael Capurro has gradually shifted his attention towards the ideas of message and of messenger. In lieu of ‘information’, he proposes and develops a new direction of research he calls Angeletics that aims to examine the nature of message and messenger, both of which are inherently social. Coincidently, at about the same time, we witnessed the rise of social epistemology in Angelo-American analytic philosophy. This coincidence is interesting, because both Capurro’s Angeletics and social epistemology indicated a departure from individualistic-orientedness in hermeneutics and traditional epistemology respectively. While social epistemology has earned its place and status in academia, especially in North America and Europe, Capurro’s Angeletics has yet to receive similar attention to which it deserves. Part of the reason for this, I think, is because of its formulation and terminology is relatively unfamiliar to those who do not share the same philosophical tradition. Hence, one remedy to this situation is to attempt to translate Angeletics in terms of social epistemology, and this – is the objective of the current paper.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Orienting Social Epistemology.Francis Remedios - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
Information Cultures in the Digital Age.Matthew Kelly & Jared Bielby (eds.) - 2016 - Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Extended Knowledge and Social Epistemology.Spyrion Orestis Palermos & Duncan Pritchard - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective (8):105-120.
Social Epistemology.Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.) - 2008 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Goldman’s Knowledge in a Social World.Patrick Rysiew - 2003 - ProtoSociology 18:409-422.
Social epistemology, information science and ideology.Archie L. Dick - 2002 - Social Epistemology 16 (1):23 – 35.
Social Epistemology: Essential Readings.Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction.Alvin I. Goldman & Matthew McGrath - 2014 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthew McGrath.
Social Epistemology: A Quarter-Century Itinerary.Steve Fuller - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (3-4):267-283.
Two-Stage Reliabilism, Virtue Reliabilism, Dualism and the Problem of Sufficiency.Paul Faulkner - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (8):121-138.
Why social epistemology is real epistemology.Alvin I. Goldman - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-19

Downloads
218 (#95,265)

6 months
60 (#82,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Pak-Hang Wong
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references