Why homolaterality of language and hand dominance may not be the expression of a specific evolutionary link

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):241-241 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although gestures have surface similarities with language, there are significant organisational and neurolinguistic differences that argue against the evolutionary connection proposed by Corballis. Dominance for language and handedness may be related to a basic specialisation of the left cerebral hemisphere for target-directed behaviour and sequential processing, with the right side specialised for holistic-environmental monitoring and spatial processing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dominance runs deep.Valerie J. Grant - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):376-377.
From mouth to mouth and hand to hand: On language evolution.Uwe Jürgens - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):229-230.
An evolutionary model for the learning of language.Jechil S. Sieratzki & Bencie Woll - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):530-530.
Hand-to-hand combat, or mouth-to-mouth resuscitation?Michael C. Corballis - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):242-250.
Protosign and protospeech: An expanding spiral.Michael A. Arbib - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):209-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#521,954)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references