The inferred referendum? A rule for committee decisions

&
Theory and Decision 14 (1):75-88 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00135145

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Committee Decisions with Partisans and Side-Transfers.Mehmet Bac & Parimal Kanti Bag - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (3):267-286.
Deliberative democracy and stem cell research in new York state: The good, the bad, and the ugly.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 63-78.
A conditional defense of plurality rule: generalizing May's theorem in a restricted informational environment.Robert E. Goodin & Christian List - 2006 - American Journal of Political Science 50 (4):940-949.
Instability and Convergence Under Simple-Majority Rule: Results from Simulation of Committee Choice in Two-Dimensional Space. [REVIEW]David H. Koehler - 2001 - Theory and Decision 50 (4):305-332.
Policy and methods: Choices for legislatures.James R. Maxeiner - unknown
Knowledge of Validity.Sinan Dogramaci - 2010 - Noûs 44 (3):403-432.
Expected utility and risk.Paul Weirich - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):419-442.
The rule of rescue in clinical practice.Jonathan Hughes & Tom Walker - 2009 - Clinical Ethics 4 (1):50-54.
Rules and standards in the application of international humanitarian law.Amichai Cohen - unknown
Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: An analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions.Elizabeth A. Boyd & Lisa A. Bero - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):415-435.
Exploring the role of the ethics committee psychiatrist.Charles C. Engel - 1992 - HEC Forum 4 (6):360-371.
The 1975 Referendum on Europe, Volume 1: Reflections of the Participants. Edited by Mark Baimbridge; The 1975 Referendum on Europe, Volume 2: Current Analysis and Lessons for the Future. By Mark Baimbridge, Philip Whyman, and Andrew Mullen. [REVIEW]Barnard Turner - 2012 - The European Legacy 17 (4):567 - 568.
Decisions to follow a rule.Paul Weirich - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):280-281.
A (mainly epistemic) case for multiple-vote majority rule.Richard Bradley & Christopher Thompson - 2012 - Episteme 9 (1):63-79.
The ethical judgment of animal research.Shelley L. Gavin & Harold A. Herzog - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):263 – 286.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
32 (#487,332)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Social Choice and Individual Values.Irving M. Copi - 1952 - Science and Society 16 (2):181-181.
Social Choice and Individual Values.Kenneth Joseph Arrow - 1951 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley: New York.
The Theory of Committees and Elections.Duncan Black - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (137):248-249.

Add more references