Utilitas 8 (3):263 (1996)

Jonathan Wolff
Oxford University
There can be no doubt that Brian Barry has made an enormous contribution to the clarification of the ideas of justice current in contemporary political thought. In Barry’s Justice as Impartiality he explicitly distinguishes and sets in competition three models of justice: justice as mutual advantage; justice as reciprocity; and justice as impartiality, and he argues that we should prefer the last of these. What I want to do here is to consider four questions. First, what is this competition a competition about? Second, has Barry adequately characterised the contenders? Third, can the competition be won on the grounds Barry suggests? Fourth, is it a competition that we should want to be won by a single theory? By contrast I want to argue that there are advantages in retaining a pluralist perspective in which all three approaches remain in play
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2009
DOI 10.1017/s0953820800004994
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Impartiality.Brian Barry - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (274):603-605.
Review: Constructing Justice. [REVIEW]Allan Gibbard - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (3):264 - 279.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
147 ( #80,677 of 2,518,088 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,088 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes