Contrasts and dissociations suggest qualitative differences between conscious and unconscious processes

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):359-360 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The authors reject a computationally powerful unconscious. Instead, they suggest that simple unconscious processes give rise to complex conscious representations. We discuss evidence showing contrastive effects of conscious and unconscious processes, suggesting a distinction between these types of processes. In our view, conscious processes often serve to correct or control negative consequences of relatively simple unconscious processes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Associative learning: A generalisation too far.Martin Redington - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):351-352.
Reflection and impulse as determinants of conscious and unconscious motivation.Fritz Strack & Roland Deutsch - 2005 - In Joseph P. Forgas, Kipling D. Williams & Simon M. Laham (eds.), Social Motivation: Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-112.
Conscious and unconscious processing of emotional faces.Jack Honvank & Edward H. F. Haaden - 2001 - In Beatrice De Gelder, Edward H. F. De Haan & Charles A. Heywood (eds.), Out of Mind: Varieties of Unconscious Processes. Oxford University Press. pp. 222-237.
The emergence of consciousness: BUC versus SOC.Ron Sun - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):355-356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#301,328)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references