Aspects of technicity in Heidegger’s early philosophy: rereading Aristotle’s techné and hexis

Research in Phenomenology 38 (3):317-357 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article aims to advance our understanding of what the early Heidegger had in mind when he spoke about technics. Taking GA 18, Grundbegriffe der aristotelischen Philosophie, as a guiding text, Heidegger's “destructive” reading of the two notions most directly associated with Aristotle's presentation of technics—τεχνη and εξις—will be examined, especially with reference to the portrayal of technics in the Nicomachean Ethics. It will be argued that Aristotle already exaggerated the distinction between virtue and skill and that, instead of insisting on their similarities (as will be argued to be desirable), Heidegger drove the two notions even further apart. This enabled him to form a warped picture of technical life, which he exploited as a counter image to develop an unrealistically non-technical notion of πρα;ξις, which Heidegger implicitly advocates.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#168,676)

6 months
4 (#657,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

La relevancia de la praxis en la ontología del Dasein.Roberto Rubio - 2003 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 15 (2):303-323.

Add more references