Technology, knowledge, governance: The political relevance of Husserl’s critique of the epistemic effects of formalization

Continental Philosophy Review 46 (4):487-507 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the political import of Husserl’s critical discussion of the epistemic effects of the formalization of rational thinking. More specifically, it argues that this discussion is of direct relevance to make sense of the pervasive processes of ‘technization’, that is, of a mechanistic and superficial generation and use of knowledge, to be observed in current contexts of governance. Building upon Husserl’s understanding of formalization as a symbolic technique for abstraction in the thinking with and about numbers, I argue that processes of technization, while being necessary and legitimate procedures for the reduction of complexities, also may give rise to politically unresponsive and ultimately dysfunctional ‘economies of thinking.’ This paper is structured in three parts. In the first part I outline Husserl’s account of the formalization and technization of thought and knowledge. In the second part I make my case for the political import of this account, departing in this context from positions that (a) regard Husserl’s discussions of formalization and its effects as merely epistemological, or that (b) try to mobilize Husserl for a one-sided critique of instrumental reason. In the final part I address a major shortcoming of Husserl’s account, namely its neglect of the concrete and historically evolving technological infrastructures of processes of formalization/technization

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Philosophical Achievement of Jacob Klein.Burt Hopkins - 2011 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:282-296.
Mathematizing phenomenology.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2007 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):271-291.
Husserl, phenomenology, and foundationalism.Walter Hopp - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):194 – 216.
Limitations of formalization.Constantine Politis - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):356-360.
The phenomenology of Husserl.R. O. Elveton - 1970 - Chicago,: Quadrangle Books.
Heidegger's early critique of Husserl.Søren Overgaard - 2003 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
Contexts, oracles, and relevance.Varol Akman & Mehmet Surav - 1995 - In Proceedings of the AAAI-95 Fall Symposium on Formalizing Context (AAAI Technical Report FS-95-02). Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Press. pp. 23-30.
Heidegger's critique of Husserl's and Brentano's accounts of intentionality.Dermot Moran - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):39-65.
Radical Philosophy of Technology.Andrew Feenberg - 2009 - Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1-2):199-217.
Husserl on Analyticity and Beyond.Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock - 2008 - Husserl Studies 24 (2):131-140.
Phenomenology and Technology.Iain Thomson - 2009 - In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 195–201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-26

Downloads
57 (#251,825)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Knowledge and human interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1971 - London [etc.]: Heinemann Educational.
Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy.Edmund Husserl - 1980 - Hingham, MA, USA: Distributors for the U.S. and Canada, Kluwer Boston.
Logical investigations.Edmund Husserl - 2000 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Dermot Moran.

View all 25 references / Add more references