Why I Won’t Hurt Your Felines?

In Steven Hales (ed.), What Philosophy Can Tell You About Your Cat. Open Court Publishing (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some philosophers (such as Kant and Rawls) think it is only wrong to be cruel to cats because it will make one behave cruelly to humans. This explanation is unsatisfactory. Why? Because being cruel to your cat is a direct wrong to your cat regardless of the effects it has on other humans. Ascribing the wrongness of cruelty to the fact it will make one callous to other humans is to assess the character of the cruel person not the act they are performing. Cruelty to your cat is wrong because it wrongs your cat directly.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rawls and Animals.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 1998 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1):63-77.
Naturalizing cruelty.G. Randolph Mayes - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (1):21–34.
A murky portrait of human cruelty.Albert Bandura - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):225-226.
Animal rights, human wrongs.Tom Regan - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (2):99-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-08

Downloads
61 (#259,066)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia Tanner
Durham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references