To the End of Dogmatism in Molecular Biology

Biosemiotics 14 (1):67-72 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Denis Nobel looks at four important misinterpretations of molecular biology concerning evolutionary processes and demonstrates that the new synthesis today looks rather outdated. The modern synthesis is nearly 80 years old. The proponents who worked out the modern synthesis had no access to the current knowledge on cell biology, genetics, epigenetics, RNA biology and virology. Therefore this contribution adds several aspects which Nobel’s article does not explicitly mention, providing some examples for a better understanding of evolutionary novelty.

Similar books and articles

The Illusions of the Modern Synthesis.Denis Noble - forthcoming - Biosemiotics:1-20.
How Evolutionary Biology Presently Pervades Cell and Molecular Biology.Michel Morange - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):113 - 120.
Reduction and Progress in Biology.Sun Kyeong Yu - 2007 - International Journal of the Humanities 5:133-139.
Molecular Genetics and the Foundations of Evolution.Bernard D. Davis - 1985 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 28 (2):251-268.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-13

Downloads
250 (#77,261)

6 months
101 (#37,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guenther Witzany
Telos - Philosophische Praxis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Evolution of Genetic Information without Error Replication.Guenther Witzany - 2020 - In Theoretical Information Studies. Singapur: pp. 295-319.
What is Life?Guenther Witzany - 2020 - Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7:1-13.

View all 7 references / Add more references