Swiss Philosophical Preprints (2010)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In my essay, I will argue that evolution does not undermine naturalism. This is because Alvin Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism rests on a false and unmotivated premise and is thus invalid. My argument consists of two parts: In the expository part, I outline Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism in considerable detail (section 2). In the argumentative part, I firstly pose William Ramsey’s challenge to Plantinga’s probabilistic claim that the reliability of human cognitive faculties is low and critically examine Plantinga’s response in order to reinforce it (section 3). Secondly, I attack Plantinga’s understanding of human evolution, which motivates his cognitive skepticism, as being unduly narrow (section 4).
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution.Peter J. Richerson & Robert Boyd - 2005 - Chicago University Press.
Culture in Primates and Other Animals.Carel P. Van Schaik - 2009 - In Robin Dunbar & Louise Barrett (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Plantinga's Innocent Assumption: Self-Defeating Naturalism, and Churchland's Response.Matt DeStefano - 2006 - Res Cogitans 3 (1):26-33.
What’s Wrong with the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
Response to Stephen Law on the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.Calum Miller - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (1):147-152.
Naturalism and Self-Defeat: Plantinga's Version.N. M. L. Nathan - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142.
Semantic Inferentialism and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.James Henry Collin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (9):846-856.
Alvin Plantinga on Paul Draper’s Evolutionary Atheology: Implications of Theism’s Noncontingency.Tyler Andrew Wunder - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):67-75.
Does Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism Work?Wang-yen Lee - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (1):73.
A User’s Guide to the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.Omar Mirza - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (2):125 - 146.
Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.James K. Beilby (ed.) - 2002 - Cornell University Press.
Plantinga’s Probability Arguments Against Evolutionary Naturalism.Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):115–129.
Naturalized Truth and Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.Feng Ye - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):27-46.
Biblical and Theistic Arguments Against the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.Petteri Nieminen, Maarten Boudry, Esko Ryökäs & Anne-Mari Mustonen - 2017 - Zygon 52 (1):9-23.
Proposta de Argumento Contra o Naturalismo Metafísico.Domingos Faria - 2014 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 18 (3):361.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
Plantinga on the Epistemic Implications of Naturalism.David Reiter - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:141-147.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-11-25
Total views
146 ( #80,237 of 2,507,635 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,797 of 2,507,635 )
2017-11-25
Total views
146 ( #80,237 of 2,507,635 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,797 of 2,507,635 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads