Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Before replication becomes mainstream, the potential for generating theoretical knowledge better be clear. Replicating statistically significant nonrandom data shows that an original study made a discovery; replicating a specified theoretical effect shows that an original study corroborated a theory. Yet only in the latter case is replication a necessary, sound, and worthwhile strategy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Impossibility Results for Measures of Corroboration.Jan Sprenger - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (1):139--159.
Précis of statistical significance: Rationale, validity, and utility.Siu L. Chow - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):169-194.
The big test of corroboration.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2008 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):293 – 302.
The corroboration paradox.Carl G. Wagner - 2013 - Synthese 190 (8):1455-1469.
Intersubjective corroboration.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):124-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-28

Downloads
23 (#644,212)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Zenker
Nankai University

Citations of this work

Add more citations