Is There a Moral Reason To Limit Family Size?

Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 29 (3/4):26-31 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although we have an important obligation to protect the environment, people are not morally required to choose to have smaller families for environmental reasons.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Environmental ethics and size.Charles S. Cockell - 2008 - Ethics and the Environment 13 (1):pp. 23-39.
Is the Family Uniquely Valuable?Anca Gheaus - 2012 - Ethics and Social Welfare 6 (2):120-131.
Family, choice and distributive justice.Veronique Munoz-Dardé - 2002 - In David Archard & Colin Macleod (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children. Oxford University Press.
Neurological models of size scaling.Helen E. Ross - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):425-425.
The moral and political status of children.David Archard - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):490-492.
Parental Authority and Pediatric Bioethical Decision Making.M. J. Cherry - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):553-572.
Corporate Social Performance in Family Firms.Sara A. Morris - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:154-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-23

Downloads
5 (#1,514,558)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references