Is epiphenomenalism refutable?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (52):303-306 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What was Huxley's epiphenomenalism?Neil Campbell - 2001 - Biology and Philosophy 16 (3):357-375.
In defence of qualia-epiphenomenalism.Volker Gadenne - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (1-2):101-114.
Explanatory epiphenomenalism.Neil Campbell - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):437-451.
Epiphenomenalism and the notion of cause.John Lachs - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (March):141-45.
Epiphenomenalism and content.Mark Eli Kalderon - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 52 (1):71-90.
Epiphenomenalism, laws, and properties.Denis Robinson - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (1):1-34.
Anomalous monism and epiphenomenalism.Rex Welshon - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1):103-120.
Epiphenomenalism and the eliminative strategy.Jason A. Beyer - 1999 - Kinesis 26 (1):18-36.
Trying out epiphenomenalism.Peter Bieri - 1992 - Erkenntnis 36 (3):283-309.
Mr. Farrell and the refutability of psychoanalysis.Michael Martin - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):80 – 98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Popper's metaphysical research program for the human sciences.Noretta Koertge - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):437 – 462.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references