Base property exemplification and mixed worlds: remarks on the Shafer-Landau/Mabrito exchange

Philosophical Studies 138 (3):429-434 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I distinguish between a synchronic view of base property exemplification and a diachronic one. I argue that only a diachronic view of base property exemplification can substantiate a ban on morally mixed worlds. I then argue that one of Robert Mabrito’s recent criticisms of Russ Shafer-Landau’s moral realism fails on either a synchronic or a diachronic view.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does Shafer-Landau have a problem with supervenience?Robert Mabrito - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):297 - 311.
Moral realism: a defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Samples as symbols.Mark Textor - 2008 - Ratio 21 (3):344-359.
Anti-reductionism and supervenience.Michael Ridge - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):330-348.
Reply to Shafer-Landau, Mcpherson, and Dancy. [REVIEW]Mark Schroeder - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (3):463-474.
Shafer-Landau and Moral Realism.Christian Miller - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (2):311-331.
Moral realism: A defence. [REVIEW]Michael Ridge - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):540 – 544.
The Ethical Life, 3rd ed.Russ Shafer Landau (ed.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Oxford Studies in Metaethics, volume 6.Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
80 (#204,784)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeff Wisdom
Joliet Junior College

References found in this work

Moral realism: a defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Does Shafer-Landau have a problem with supervenience?Robert Mabrito - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (2):297 - 311.

Add more references