Surveillance in ubiquitous network societies: normative conflicts related to the consumer in-store supermarket experience in the context of the Internet of Things

Ethics and Information Technology 16 (1):27-41 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging global infrastructure that employs wireless sensors to collect, store, and exchange data. Increasingly, applications for marketing and advertising have been articulated as a means to enhance the consumer shopping experience, in addition to improving efficiency. However, privacy advocates have challenged the mass aggregation of personally-identifiable information in databases and geotracking, the use of location-based services to identify one’s precise location over time. This paper employs the framework of contextual integrity related to privacy developed by Nissenbaum (Privacy in context: technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2010) as a tool to understand citizen response to implementation IoT-related technology in the supermarket. The purpose of the study was to identify and understand specific changes in information practices brought about by the IoT that may be perceived as privacy violations. Citizens were interviewed, read a scenario of near-term IoT implementation, and were asked to reflect on changes in the key actors involved, information attributes, and principles of transmission. Areas where new practices may occur with the IoT were then highlighted as potential problems (privacy violations). Issues identified included the mining of medical data, invasive targeted advertising, and loss of autonomy through marketing profiles or personal affect monitoring. While there were numerous aspects deemed desirable by the participants, some developments appeared to tip the balance between consumer benefit and corporate gain. This surveillance power creates an imbalance between the consumer and the corporation that may also impact individual autonomy. The ethical dimensions of this problem are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nanotechnology and Privacy.Jeroen van den Hoven - 2006 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):215-228.
studiVZ: social networking in the surveillance society. [REVIEW]Christian Fuchs - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):171-185.
Global Democratic Transformation and the Internet.Carol C. Gould - 2006 - Social Philosophy Today 22:73-88.
Causality and things in themselves.Kent Baldner - 1988 - Synthese 77 (3):353 - 373.
Privacy, the workplace and the internet.Seumas Miller & John Weckert - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 28 (3):255 - 265.
Reflexive marketing: the cultural circuit of loyalty programs. [REVIEW]Jason Pridmore - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):565-581.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-17

Downloads
44 (#343,283)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Ulrich Beck, Mark Ritter & Jennifer Brown - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):367-368.
The ontological interpretation of informational privacy.Luciano Floridi - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (4):185–200.
Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies.James H. Moor - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):111-119.
Personal autonomy in the travel panopticon.Eamon Daly - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):97-108.

View all 9 references / Add more references