Science in the New Age: The Paranormal, Its Defenders and Debunkers, and American Culture:Science in the New Age: The Paranormal, Its Defenders and Debunkers, and American Culture

Anthropology of Consciousness 6 (1):36-37 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1525/ac.1995.6.1.36

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science in the New Age: The Paranormal, Its Defenders and Debunkers, and American Culture by David J. Hess. [REVIEW]Stephen Weldon - 1994 - Isis 85:551-552.
David J. Hess, Science in the New Age: The Paranormal, Its Defenders and Debunkers, and American Culture. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993. Pp. xi + 243. ISBN 0-229-13820-8, £38.50 ; 0-229-13824-0, £16.50 (paperback. [REVIEW]Seymour Mauskopf - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Science 28 (3):369-370.
Skeptical Saints and Critical Cognition: On the Relationship between Religion and Paranormal Beliefs.Douglas S. Krull & Eric S. McKibben - 2006 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 28 (1):269-285.
Skeptical Saints and Critical Cognition: On the Relationship between Religion and Paranormal Beliefs.Douglas S. Krull & Eric S. McKibben - 2006 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie 28 (1):269-285.
Introducing the Modified Paranormal Belief Scale: Distinguishing Between Classic Paranormal Beliefs, Religious Paranormal Beliefs and Conventional Religiosity Among Undergraduates in Northern Ireland and Wales.Emyr Williams, Christopher Lewis & Leslie Francis - 2009 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (3):345-356.
The Philosophical Foundations of Paranormal Phenomena.Harry Settanni - 1992 - Upa.
Believe It Or Not: Religious and Other Paranormal Beliefs in the United States.Tom W. Rice - 2003 - Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42 (1):95-106.
Paranormal modal logic – Part II: K?, K and Classical Logic and other paranormal modal systems.R. Silvestre - 2013 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 22 (1):89-130.
The Effectiveness of Instruction in Scientific Reasoning in Altering Paranormal Beliefs in High School Students.Paul Revere Priest - 1995 - Dissertation, La Sierra University
Empirical Research and Paranormal Beliefs: Going Beyond the Epistemological Debate in Favour of the Individual.François P. Mathijsen - 2009 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 31 (3):319-333.
Paranormal Claims: A Critical Analysis.Michael Shermer, Stephen Barrett, Barry L. Beyerstein, Susan Blackmore, Geoffrey Dean, Bryan Farha, Ray Hyman, Joe Nickell, Benjamin Radford, James Randi, Linda Rosa & Carl Sagan (eds.) - 2007 - Upa.
Paranormal modal logic–Part I: The system K? and the foundations of the Logic of skeptical and credulous plausibility.Ricardo S. Silvestre - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (1):65-96.
Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics.Michiel van Elk - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):1041-1046.
Magic and memory: using conjuring to explore the effects of suggestion, social influence, and paranormal belief on eyewitness testimony for an ostensibly paranormal event.Krissy Wilson & Christopher C. French - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Is normal memory a paranormal phenomenon?John Beloff - 1980 - Theoria to Theory 14 (September):145-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
16 (#886,588)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references