Partnership in U.K. Biobank: A Third Way for Genomic Property?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):440-456 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A property analysis of the U.K. Biobank reveals a new imagination of the genomic biobank as a national commonpool resource. U.K. Biobank's treatment of property and governance exhibit both strengths and weaknesses that may be instructive to genome project planners around the world

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00166.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Privacy and property in the biobank context.Lars Oystein Ursin - 2010 - HEC Forum 22 (3):211-224.
The Indian genomic biobank initiative and emerging bioethical issues : a community-based perspective.Prasanna Kumar Patra & Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner - 2009 - In Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner (ed.), Human Genetic Biobanks in Asia: Politics of Trust and Scientific Advancement. Routledge.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Genomic Programs as Mechanism Schemas: A Non-Reductionist Interpretation.Tudor M. Baetu - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):649-671.
The Public Interest, Public Goods, and Third-Party Access to UK Biobank.B. Capps - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (3):240-251.
Biobanks--When is Re-consent Necessary?K. S. Steinsbekk & B. Solberg - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):236-250.
Withdrawing from Research: A Rethink in the Context of Research Biobanks. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (3):269-281.
The Biobank as an Ethical Subject.Sean Cordell - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (3):282-294.
Alternative consent models for biobanks: The new spanish law on biomedical research.Antonio Casado Rochdaa & José Antonio Seoane - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (8):440-447.
Does an appeal to the common good justify individual sacrifices for genomic research?Rogeer Hoedemaekers, Bert Gordijn & Martien Pijnenburg - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (5):415-431.
Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Policies and politics in social pacts in europe.Anke Hassel - unknown
Grasping phenomenal properties.Martine Nida-Rümelin - 2006 - In Torin Andrew Alter & Sven Walter (eds.), Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
Knowledge discovery and system-user partnership: On a production “adversarial partnership” approach. [REVIEW]Z. Chen - 1994 - AI and Society 8 (4):341-356.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
53 (#288,387)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Do Groups Have Moral Standing in Unregulated mHealth Research?Joon-Ho Yu & Eric Juengst - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):122-128.
Population Genomics and Research Ethics with Socially Identifable Groups.Joan L. McGregor - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):356-370.
Population Genomics and Research Ethics with Socially Identifiable Groups.Joan L. McGregor - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (3):356-370.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Democracy and Disagreement.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 1996 - Ethics 108 (3):607-610.

View all 7 references / Add more references