Synthese 192 (6):1585-1608 (2015)

Andrzej Wiśniewski
Adam Mickiewicz University
Inferential erotetic logic and inquisitive semantics give accounts of questions and model various aspects of questioning. In this paper we concentrate upon connections between inquisitiveness, being the core concept of INQ, and question raising, characterized in IEL by means of the concepts of question evocation and erotetic implication. We consider the basic system InqB of INQ, remain at the propositional level and show, inter alia, that: a disjunction of all the direct answers to an evoked question is always inquisitive; a formula is inquisitive if, and only if it evokes a yes–no question whose affirmative answer expresses a possibility for the formula; inquisitive formulas evoke questions whose direct answers express all the possibilities for the formulas, and each question erotetically implies a question whose direct answers express the possibilities for the direct answers to the implying question
Keywords Logic of questions  Inferential erotetic logic  Inquisitive semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0355-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Multiple Conclusion Logic.D. J. Shoesmith & Timothy Smiley - 1978 - Cambridge, England / New York London Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
The Logic of Questions and Answers.Nuel D. Belnap & Thomas B. Steel (eds.) - 1976 - New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 1995 - Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Inquisitive Logic.Ivano Ciardelli & Floris Roelofsen - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (1):55-94.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Questions as Information Types.Ivano Ciardelli - 2018 - Synthese 195 (1):321-365.
Erotetic Search Scenarios and Three-Valued Logic.Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion & Paweł Łupkowski - 2016 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 25 (1):51-76.
Support and Sets of Situations.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (3):383-396.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Weak Negation in Inquisitive Semantics.Vít Punčochář - 2015 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (3):323-355.
Support and Sets of Situations.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2014 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23 (3):383-396.
Focus and Uninformativity in Yucatec Maya Questions.Scott AnderBois - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (4):349-390.
Erotetic Search Scenarios.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2003 - Synthese 134 (3):389 - 427.
Socratic Proofs.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):299-326.
Erotetic Implications.Andrzej Wiśniewski - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (2):173 - 195.


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #248,388 of 2,520,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes