Similar books and articles
Czech and Tartu-Moscow Semiotics: The Cultural Semiotics of Vladimir Macura.Thomas G. Winner - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:158-179.
Jan Mukařovský and the Prague School.Vladimír Macura & Herta Schmid (eds.) - 1999 - Ústav Pro Českou Literaturu Av Čr.
The institution of semiotics in Estonia.Kalevi Kull, Silvi Salupere, Peeter Torop & Mihhail Lotman - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):314-341.
Language, text, structure, model,(secondary) modeling system are these notions the dynamism of which—in the volume of their meaning—gives a good overview of the semiotics of Lotman and the Tartu–Moscow semiotic school until the birth of cultural semiotics in 1973. K. Eimermacher has called Lotmans ability to conjoin different terms and to provide them with novel meanings integrativity, and to this he also dedicated an article “JM Lotman: Semiotic Version of Integrative Culturology”(Eimermacher 1998 ... [REVIEW]Peeter Torop - 1999 - Sign Systems Studies 27:9-23.
The Cultural ‘Text of Behaviour’: The Moscow-Tartu School and the Religious Philosophy of Language.Dennis Ioffe - 2012 - Cultura 9 (2):175-194.
The experience of the indexical sign.Vladimír Karbusický - 1983 - American Journal of Semiotics 2 (3):35-58.
Interview with Vyacheslav V. Ivanov about semiotics, the languages of the brain and history of ideas.Ekaterina Velmezova & Kalevi Kull - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):290-313.
Semiosphere and/as the research object of semiotics of culture.Peeter Torop - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (1):159-171.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.