Why Do We Study Leibniz (After 300 Years)?

The Leibniz Review 26:1-9 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question why Leibniz continues to fascinate and perplex us 300 years after his death is one I approach with both hesitation and enthusiasm. Rather than attempting a survey of currrent controversies in Leibniz scholarship, as useful and interesting as such a survey would be, I take the opportunity to explain the underlying basis of our interest in Leibniz.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

German Scholarship on Leibniz, 1900-1945.J. E. H. Smith - 2002 - The Leibniz Review 12:137-145.
Leibniz's metaphysics.John Cottingham - 1993 - History of European Ideas 17 (2-3):360-362.
Patrick Riley’s Leibniz.David Lay Williams - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:1-8.
G. W. Leibniz. [REVIEW]Patrick Riley - 1996 - The Leibniz Review 6:127-131.
Leibniz. [REVIEW]Philip Beeley - 1995 - The Leibniz Review 5:15-17.
Leibniz. [REVIEW]George Gale - 1999 - The Leibniz Review 9:87-95.
Leibniz.Brandon C. Look - 2006 - The Leibniz Review 16:119-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-05-15

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references