Mind 87 (348):553-571 (1978)

It is notorious that Aristotle gives two distinct and seemingly irreconcilable versions of man's eudaimonia in the Nicomachean Ethics. These offer conflicting accounts not only of what the good man should do, but also of what it is good for a man to do. This paper discusses the incompatibility of these two pictures of eudaimonia, and explores the extent to which the notions of 'the life of a good man' and 'the life good for a man' can be successfully united in a single concept of eudaimonia
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/LXXXVII.4.553
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Role of Welfare in Eudaimonism.Anne Baril - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):511-535.
Is Virtue Its Own Reward?: L. W. SUMNER.L. W. Sumner - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1):18-36.
Good and Bad.Robert W. Simpson - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):101 - 117.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
150 ( #76,802 of 2,498,400 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #89,903 of 2,498,400 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes