Stammzellen-Transplantation aus Nabelschnurblut – ethische Probleme

Ethik in der Medizin 14 (2):71-83 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Definition of the problem: Stem cell transplantations from umbilical cord blood, especially if from autologous origin, are often treated with distrust. Not only are the therapeutic effects controversial, but the question of ownership is also hard to answer from an ethical point of view. Furthermore, the extraction of umbilical cord blood is already related to information about the factual and potential health condition of the child and its parents. Arguments and conclusion: The three problems will be discussed separately. Despite certain uncertainties, there are no weighty ethical arguments against the extraction of umbilical cord blood for autologous purposes. The owner of the umbilical cord blood should be the mother. The question of information is not at all typical for this problem area and does not carry more weight here than in other relevant medical situations

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stem cell spinal cord regeneration: first do no harm.M. Legge & L. M. Jones - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):838-839.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
15 (#893,994)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jean-Pierre Wils
Radboud University Nijmegen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Body, Self, and the Property Paradigm.Courtney S. Campbell - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (5):34-42.

Add more references