Review: Précis of Vagueness [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):921 - 928 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central thesis of the book is that the proposition a vague sentence expresses in a borderline case is true or false, and we cannot know which. We are ignorant of its truth-value. This is the epistemic view of vagueness. It allows us to preserve both classical logic and disquotational principles about truth and falsity, with all their advantages: simplicity, clarity, power, past success, integration with well-confirmed theories in other domains. Consequently, the epistemic view has a head start over its rivals. The gap is widened by each rival theory's specific disadvantages, many of them related to higher-order vagueness. The epistemic view is then strengthened by an explanation of our ignorance in borderline cases. The explanation predicts higher order vagueness

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Williamson on Vagueness and Context‐Dependence.Eugene Mills - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):635–641.
Review: Vagueness, Ignorance, and Margin for Error. [REVIEW]R. M. Sainsbury - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):589 - 601.
Vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 1994 - New York: Routledge.
Russell’s Leibnizian Concept of Vagueness.Larry M. Jorgensen - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (3):289-301.
Varieties of vagueness.Trenton Merricks - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):145-157.
Vagueness.Achille C. Varzi - 2003 - In Lynn Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Vol. 4. Nature Publishing Group. pp. 459–464.
Horgan on vagueness.Timothy Williamson - 2002 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 63 (1):273-285.
Review: Précis of "Knowledge and Its Limits". [REVIEW]Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):431 - 435.
Review: Soames on Vagueness. [REVIEW]Timothy Williamson - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):422 - 428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
26 (#524,350)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Williamson
University of Oxford

Citations of this work

Arbitrary reference.Wylie Breckenridge & Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (3):377-400.
Vagueness and the Laws of Metaphysics.Ryan Wasserman - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95 (1):66-89.
Epistemicism about vagueness and meta-linguistic safety.Stephen Kearns & Ofra Magidor - 2008 - Philosophical Perspectives 22 (1):277-304.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references