Philosophies of Probability: Objective Bayesianism and its Challenges

In A. Irvine (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Mathematics. Elsevier (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of the major interpretations of probability followed by an outline of the objective Bayesian interpretation and a discussion of the key challenges it faces. I discuss the ramifications of interpretations of probability and objective Bayesianism for the philosophy of mathematics in general.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Enigma Of Probability.Nick Ergodos - 2014 - Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 2 (1):37-71.
A Theistic Conception of Probability.Richard Otte - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (4):427-447.
The nature of probability.Patrick Suppes - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (1):89 - 102.
Mechanistic probability.Marshall Abrams - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):343-375.
Objective probability-like things with and without objective indeterminism.László E. Szabó - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):626-634.
Probability and determinism.Jan Von Plato - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (1):51-66.
Bayesian probability.Patrick Maher - 2010 - Synthese 172 (1):119 - 127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-04

Downloads
41 (#377,987)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jon Williamson
University of Kent

Citations of this work

Probabilistic Logics and Probabilistic Networks.Rolf Haenni, Jan-Willem Romeijn, Gregory Wheeler & Jon Williamson - 2010 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Synthese Library. Edited by Gregory Wheeler, Rolf Haenni, Jan-Willem Romeijn & and Jon Williamson.
Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Cosmic Confusions: Not Supporting versus Supporting Not.John D. Norton - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (4):501-523.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references