Personhood, Ethics, and Disability: A Comparison of Byzantine, Boethian, and Modern Concepts of Personhood

In Disability in Medieval Christian Philosophy and Theology. Oxford: Routledge. pp. 80-108 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter compares three different general accounts of personhood (Byzantine, Boethian, and Modern) and argues that if personhood is the basis on which one has equal moral status in the moral community and the disability-positive position is correct, then the Byzantine and Boethian accounts are preferable over the Modern accounts that are surveyed here. It further argues that the Byzantine account is even friendlier to a disability-positive position compared to the Boethian account.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personhood and Moral Status.Julie Tannenbaum & Agnieszka Jaworska - 2019 - In Antonia LoLordo (ed.), Persons: A History. Oxford University Press. pp. 334-362.
Narrative Ethics and Vulnerability: Kristeva and Ricoeur on Interdependence.Elizabeth Purcell - 2013 - Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 21 (1):43-59.
Disability, humanity, and personhood: A survey of moral concepts.D. Christopher Ralston & Justin Ho - 2007 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (6):619 – 633.
Split brains and singular personhood.John D. Greenwood - 1993 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):285-306.
Concepts of Person and Christian Ethics.Stanley Rudman - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Degrees of Personhood.C. Perring - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (2):173-197.
Personhood and Animals.Elisa Aaltola - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (2):175-193.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-18

Downloads
51 (#298,901)

6 months
14 (#154,299)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott M. Williams
University of North Carolina, Asheville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references