Physicalism

Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Routledge and Kegan Paul (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to dissolve the mind-body problem. It shows how the ‘problem’ separates into two distinct sets of issues, concerning ontology on the one hand, and explanation on the other, and argues that explanation – whether or not human behaviour can be explained in physical terms – is the more crucial. The author contends that a functionalist methodology in psychology and neurophysiology will prove adequate to explain human behaviour. Defence of this thesis requires: an examination of the mental/physical dichotomy, and its rejection in favour of a distinction between psychological and physical terms; a description and discussion of functionalism in psychology and neurophysiology, showing how the notorious problem of the necessary intensionality of psychological terms may be circumvented; an examination of the role of computer simulation in psycho-physical research; and an explanation of how the phenomena of sentience fit the functional framework. The book concludes that the thesis presented is in all essentials that of Aristotle; Aristotle had no ‘mind-body problem’, and were it not for a subsequent over-obsession with Cartesian scepticism, we need not have had one either

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How not to solve the mind-body problem.Colin McGinn - 2001 - In Carl Gillett & Barry M. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.
Mind-body, body-mind: Two distinct problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.
The mind-body problem after fifty years.Jaegwon Kim - 1998 - In Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3-21.
The Mind-Body Problem at Century's Turn.Jaegwon Kim - 2004 - In Brian Leiter (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Clarendon Press. pp. 129-152.
Mind-body: What is the question?Evalyn F. Segal - 1976 - Philosophy Forum 14 (4):325-350.
A new objection to A Priori arguments for dualism.Trenton Merricks - 1994 - American Philosophical Quarterly 31 (1):81-85.
Emergence and the mind-body problem.Michael Silberstein - 1998 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (4):464-82.
Physicalism and psychology: A plea for a substantive philosophy of mind.Georges Rey - 2001 - In Carl Gillett & Barry Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
91 (#184,038)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Two objections to methodological solipsism.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):93-94.
Mind, Mathematics and the I gnorabimusstreit.Neil Tennant - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (4):745 – 773.
The formal and the opaque.Georges Rey - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):90-92.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references