On ‘modified human agents’: John Lilly and the paranoid style in American neuroscience

History of the Human Sciences 32 (5):84-107 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The personal papers of the neurophysiologist John C. Lilly at Stanford University hold a classified paper he wrote in the late 1950s on the behavioural modification and control of ‘human agents’. The paper provides an unnerving prognosis of the future application of Lilly’s research, then being carried out at the National Institute of Mental Health. Lilly claimed that the use of sensory isolation, electrostimulation of the brain, and the recording and mapping of brain activity could be used to gain ‘push-button’ control over motivation and behaviour. This research, wrote Lilly, could eventually lead to ‘master-slave controls directly of one brain over another’. The paper is an explicit example of Lilly’s preparedness to align his research towards Cold War military aims. It is not, however, the research for which Lilly is best known. During the 1960s and 1970s, Lilly developed cult status as a far-out guru of consciousness exploration, promoting the use of psychedelics and sensory isolation tanks. Lilly argued that, rather than being used as tools of brainwashing, these techniques could be employed by the individual to regain control of their own mind and retain a sense of agency over their thoughts and actions. This article examines the scientific, intellectual, and cultural relationship between the sciences of brainwashing and psychedelic mind alteration. Through an analysis of Lilly’s autobiographical writings, I also show how paranoid ideas about brainwashing and mind control provide an important lens for understanding the trajectory of Lilly’s research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward the later Heidegger.John D. Caputo & Reginald Lilly - 1982 - Research in Phenomenology 12 (1):213-219.
Review. [REVIEW]J. Robert Lilly - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (4):149-151.
The eclipse of earth and man.Reginald Lilly - 1992 - Research in Phenomenology 22 (1):199-207.
Evaluating Animal Research.Lilly-Marlene Russow - 1986 - Between the Species 2 (4):11.
The topology of Des hegemonies brisées.Reginald Lilly - 1998 - Research in Phenomenology 28 (1):226-242.
Will the circle remain unbroken?Reginald Lilly - 1986 - Research in Phenomenology 16 (1):227-234.
Heidegger and the God of hölderlin.Michel Haar & Reginald Lilly - 1989 - Research in Phenomenology 19 (1):89-100.
Des hégémonies brisées.R. Schürmann, R. Lilly & Dj da HylandSchmidt - 1998 - Research in Phenomenology 28 (1):225-271.
It's Not like That to be a Bat.Lilly-Marlene Russow - 1982 - Behaviorism 10 (1):55-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-05

Downloads
26 (#595,031)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The political technology of individuals.Michel Foucault - 1988 - In Michel Foucault, Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman & Patrick H. Hutton (eds.), Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. pp. 145--162.

View all 7 references / Add more references