Moore, the diaphanousness of consciousness, and physicalism

Metaphysica 5 (2):133-50 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I discuss the main features of Moore’s characterization of consciousness in his well-known 1903 “The Refutation of Idealism” and his little-known 1910 “The Subject-Matter of Psychology.” The presentation is somewhere between an expository exercise in the history of analytical ontology and a philosophical engagement with Moore’s interesting claims. Among other things, I argue that Moore’s famous thesis of the “diaphanousness” of consciousness cannot, contrary to Moore’s own claims, be used to undermine physicalism but in fact can be used to undercut some common arguments against physicalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Physicalism.Daniel D. Hutto - 2000 - Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Consciousness, subjectivity and physicalism.Xiangdong Xu - 2004 - Philosophical Inquiry 26 (1-2):21-39.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Post-physicalism.Barbara Montero - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (2):61-80.
Non-reductive physicalism?A. D. Smith - 1993 - In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
The argument from diaphanousness.Daniel Stoljar - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (Supplement):341--90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kenneth Williford
University of Texas at Arlington

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references