Inducement in Research

Bioethics 11 (5):373-389 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Opposition to inducement payments for research subjects is an international orthodoxy amongst writers of ethics committee guidelines. We offer an argument in favour of these payments. We also critically evaluate the best arguments we can find or devise against such payments, and except in one very limited range of circumstances, we find these unconvincing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Meaningful work as due inducement.Charles Weijer - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (5):431-435.
Socio-Economic Status and Inducement to Participate.Adrian M. Viens - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):1f-2f.
Ending Concerns About Undue Inducement.Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):100-105.
“Undue Inducement' as Coercive Offers.Joan McGregor - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):24 – 25.
Undue inducement: The only objection to payment?Ari VanderWalde - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):25 – 27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-01

Downloads
47 (#322,078)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Moore
University of Otago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references