Eugenics: positive vs negative

Eugenics Archives (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The distinction between positive and negative eugenics is perhaps the best-known distinction that has been made between forms that eugenics takes. Roughly, positive eugenics refers to efforts aimed at increasing desirable traits, while negative eugenics refers to efforts aimed at decreasing undesirable traits. Still, it is easy to fall into confusion in drawing and deploying the distinction in particular contexts. Clarity here is important not only historically, but also for appeals to the distinction in contemporary discussions of “new eugenics” or “newgenics”.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The New Eugenics and Medicalized Reproduction.Jacques Testart - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (3):304.
Eugenics negative and positive.Hugh Richardson - 1932 - The Eugenics Review 23 (4):380.
Negative eugenics and ethical decisions.David E. W. Fenner - 1996 - Journal of Medical Humanities 17 (1):17-30.
Berlin’s two concepts of positive liberty.Janos Kis - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
Truth breakers.Dale Jacquette - 2010 - Topoi 29 (2):153-163.
Buck-passers' negative thesis.Mark Schroeder - 2009 - Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):341-347.
Negative actions.Benjamin Mossel - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2):307-333.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-17

Downloads
5,059 (#1,056)

6 months
1,746 (#440)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert A. Wilson
University of Western Australia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references