Ethics for a Layered Self: Laughter, Reciprocity, Generosity, Home

philoSOPHIA: A Journal of Continental Feminism 5 (1):70-79 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Ethics for a Layered SelfLaughter, Reciprocity, Generosity, HomeCynthia WillettI can imagine no better way to respond to these insightful readings than to turn the spotlight on the important books that Ann Murphy and Megan Craig have written on affect and ethics! Craig’s book, Levinas and James: Toward a Pragmatic Phenomenology, weaves radical empiricism into phenomenology as only a philosopher who is also an artist could. Her evocative queries on prereflective affects, perception, and ethical attunement shed light on the role of moods for unsettling rigid ego boundaries, ethical subjectivity, the feeling of being alive, the audible dimension of ethical encounters, life beyond a struggle to survive, temporality, and ethical ambiguity. These themes are compelling for any postmoral ethics that operates beyond or below the register of modern moral theory’s abstract laws and transparent cogitos. Her work balances an ethical concern for vulnerability with a vital regard for the vibrancy of living creatures and landscapes.Ann Murphy’s Violence and the Philosophical Imaginary illuminates philosophical questions with an abiding lucidity that does not weaken but amplifies the complexity and difficulty of ethics. Murphy’s work exposes how tropes of violence saturate philosophical discourses of both identity formation and of political and historical transformation, and how this violence, embedded in norms, denies sympathetic concern to those outside the limits of cultural intelligibility. Building upon recent work by Judith Butler, Adriana Caverero, and others, Murphy addresses the ambiguities arising from the multiple responses that exposure to vulnerability provokes. These responses can signal care but [End Page 70] they can also manifest violence. Even as she acknowledges the complex underside of cultural intelligibility, Murphy affirms sympathy and generous concern as paradigmatic virtues to be cultivated in response to various forms of violence. She probes the significance of shame and guilt for collective responsibility, ever alert to alterity and difference. With attentive care to the singular contributions of a broad range of philosophers and critical traditions, she argues compellingly for a corporeal ethics grounded on the ontological fact of vulnerability.Through their work, Murphy and Craig pose astute questions for my project, and, in fact, for any endeavor to conceptualize an ethics attentive to an embodied sociality. I describe the multifaceted approach I contribute toward this task as a call and response ethics for a layered self. Craig wonders if the more basic feature before any “call” is contact, touch, or immersion. She notes my concern that “any purported gap or abyss between humans and animals has less to do with unique human capacities than with the rise of urban centers and the loss of contact with other species.” Harm arises from a loss of contact. This is so true. Ethics as contact calls attention to the poetry of proximity, to erotic waves that transmit through the sound or feel of the other’s breath, the heat of the body, and the smell of the skin. This intense proximity serves as a compelling source for ethical sociality, resonating in some respects with what Merleau-Ponty explores as the sense of flesh and touch and, as Murphy suggests, a transcendental eros. This contact is as primal and ordinary as the skin-to-skin contact of caregiver and infant or, perhaps, the skin-to-hair contact of a terrier and her human companion, lost for a moment in inexplicable laughter. From these observations, Craig asks if “call and response” as a locution or central designation adequately captures the intimacy and intensity of these engagements.Craig’s remarks raise the further question of what is at stake in designations or phrasings. An ethics of call and response, designated as such, emerges from phenomenological but also crucially Africana and critical theory traditions. As a relational ethics, this ethics of call and response highlights social relations and expectations, opening a path outside of what Murphy characterizes as the trifecta of virtue ethics, deontology, and utilitarianism. It attends to desire (eros) beneath, in between, and above the prescriptive rules of moral reason or the interests of individuals. At its center are social bonds (friendship and companionship, community and domination, love, hate, and other social emotions, belonging and alienation, and the conflicts of groups and reconciliation) rather...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recenterings of Continental Philosophy.Cynthia Willett & Leonard Lawler - 2010 - Philosophy Today 54 (Supplement):3-4.
The Role of the Nicomachean Ethics in Contemporary Discussions of Ethics.Pierre Aubenque - 2015 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 36 (2):425-436.
The Ethical.Edith Wyschogrod & Gerald P. McKenny (eds.) - 2003 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
A Reply to Cynthia Willett.George di Giovanni - 1990 - Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America 10:93-98.
Cynthia Willett. Interspecies Ethics.Abigail Levin - 2015 - Environmental Philosophy 12 (2):273-277.
The Ethical.Edith Wyschogrod & Gerald P. McKenny (eds.) - 2003 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Aristotle’s Ethics as First Philosophy. [REVIEW]Eric P. Sanday - 2008 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 29 (2):185-195.
Philosophy, Evolutionary Biology, and Ethics.Strachan Donnelley - 2001 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 23 (1):147-163.
Solipsism in Kant’s Practical Philosophy and the Discourse Ethics.Wolfgang Kuhlmann - 1990 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 13 (2):159-179.
Interspecies Ethics.Cynthia Willett - 2014 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Ethics and Qualities of Life. [REVIEW]Scott Wilson - 2009 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):147-153.
The Shadow of Hegel's Science of Logic.Cynthia Willett - 1990 - Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America 10:85-92.
The Ethics of Deconstruction. [REVIEW]Hans Ruin - 1994 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 17 (1-2):429-436.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
6 (#1,269,502)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cynthia Willett
Emory University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references